What is the Battle of Pydna? – Discover the consequences of the Battle of Pydna
History is made up of crucial moments, in which a mark has been left that transcends civilizations. One of these Important events it is the battle that took place in a field known as Pydna. In this What It Is article, we will explore more about what happened in the history of ancient Greece and its impact on the region.
How was the Battle of Pydna?
It was the confrontation between the army of King Perseus of Macedonia, against the army of Rome, commanded by Lucio Emilio Paulo, in the year 168 BC. This battle meant the end of the monarchy in Macedoniawho were the heirs of Alexander the Great.
In addition, it meant the end of one of the military formations that they were considered legends, who they were: the phalanx made up of lancers. Likewise, it marks the beginning of Rome’s rule over Greece.
The battle took place in a field near the city of Pydna, in the Macedonian region. On the one hand, the Macedonian army had its phalanx formations, known for their battle expertise and discipline, and well-trained cavalry. Likewise, the Roman army was not far behind, They were characterized by the famous legionwho inspired fear and had high discipline.
The confrontation began when Lucio Paulo’s troops crossed the river. During the course of the battle, the consul released 30 elephants to overwhelm the Macedonian cavalry on the left.
Phalanx troops they were lethal on level ground, since their spears measure up to 7 meters, but, when the Roman troops fled to Mount Olorco, the king decided that the phalanxes would advance, instead of sending the cavalry after them. Once they found themselves on uneven ground, the alignment fell into disarray and the Romans were able to counterattack.
The Macedonian Phalanges they tried to block the attack of the Roman legions, but the latter had maneuvering tactics and adaptability. In this way they managed to overcome the Macedonian defenses in number and strategy. While the Macedonian cavalry tried to stop the Roman advance, they were unable to reverse the situation.
King Perseus fought valiantly until find yourself in an increasingly cornered position. In the end, it was captured by Roman forces, thus marking the end of the Macedonian kingdom.
What were the causes of the Battle of Pydna?
The causes of this battle date back to previous conflicts between the kingdom of Macedonia and the Roman Republicas well as the ambition of both leaders for control of the Hellenistic world.
For many years, the kingdom of Macedonia held all of Greece under its power, which they obtained and maintained thanks to the phalanxes, one of the most effective and lethal military units that existed at the time.
One of the main causes of the Battle of Pydna is the growing power of the Romans in the Mediterranean region. Rome was eager to expand in terms of territory, and had carried out a series of victorious military campaignsin order to expand. The success of the Roman forces worried King Perseus of Macedonia, who felt threatened by his position.
There was a dispute over control of certain strategic areas and key trade routes, in addition, Macedonia had important gold and silver mines. This made the territory attractive for increasing economic power and expanding Roman influence.
In the year 71 BC Lucio Emilio Paulo, who was a general and consul, at the age of 60, take the reins of the army. He recruited more than 20,000 soldiers for the infantry and at least 1,000 horsemen, with this army he went to Greece, to the Elpeo River that was near the city of Pydna.
The consul gave the order to his legate to march with a part of the Roman army to the city of Dion, in this way they surrounded the Macedonian army. Perseus, learning of the Romans’ plan, back to the plain to be closer, to exploit the full strength of the Macedonian phalanx.
Who participated in the Battle of Pydna?
On one side, the kingdom of Macedonia, led by King Perseus, and on the other, the Roman Republic, headed by General Lucio Emilio Paulo. Both were the leaders played a role in the development and outcome of the battle.
According to Plutarch, the army of King Perseus consisted of at least 4,000 cavalry and 40,000 foot soldiers, although Tito Livio mentions that, in reality, there were 30,000 soldiers in its entirety. While the Roman army was made up of at least 38,000 soldiers and more than 20 elephants.
The Macedonian army had the famous phalanges, a well-trained and disciplined infantry forceas well as expert cavalry.
On the other hand, the army of Rome was made up of legions, which they were very disciplined unitsable to adapt to different situations during combat.
Some allied factions became involved in the battle, for example, certain city-states in Greece that joined the Roman forces, as they aspired to break free from Macedonian rule.
How did the Battle of Pydna end?
This confrontation came to an end with a victory for the forces of the Roman Republic, while the result was devastating for King Perseus and the Kingdom of Macedonia. During the confrontation, the Roman forces managed to overcome their enemy’s defenses on the battlefield, and despite the bravery shown by the Macedonian forces, they found themselves outnumbered and strategically outmatched.
King Perseus fled the battle with his cavalry, but was betrayed by his own relatives, who feared execution. Although continued his escape attemptsHe is ultimately captured by the Roman Republic, along with his two sons. His final fate is highly uncertain, with some saying that he died of natural causes in Roman custody, and others that he may have been executed.
Consul Lucio Emilio Paulo, I take the decision to divide the kingdom of Macedonia into 4 republicsall under the power of Rome, in order to avoid the uprising by those peoples who did not support the Republic.
What were the consequences of the Battle of Pydna?
The consequences of the defeat of Macedonia, were reflected in both the political and military spheres, these are:
- The annexation of Macedonia to the Roman RepublicIn this way, the independence of this kingdom was ended.
- expansion of roman powerwith the annexation the presence of Rome was consolidated and its territory expanded further.
- Mark the end of the political independence of Greece.
- caused changes in the political and military structuregranting prestige to the Roman army, for having defeated the famous Macedonian phalanxes.
- HE transformed the Hellenistic worldsince there was a fusion of Roman and Greek culture, which was known as ‘the Hellenization of Rome’, influencing the language, religion and politics, etc.